HTML Guide

Bad value X for attribute “width” on element “embed”: Expected a digit but saw “%” instead.

width
embed

embed does not allow percentage values for the width (or height) attribute; only non-negative integers in CSS pixels are valid.

Explanation

The embed element’s width and height content attributes accept only non-negative integers representing CSS pixels, per WHATWG HTML. A value like width="100%" is invalid.
To make an embedded resource responsive or percentage-based, set numeric pixel values in attributes (or omit them) and control sizing with CSS using the style attribute or external stylesheets.
Valid approaches:
- Use width="600" (pixels) directly on embed.
- Omit width/height and use CSS like style="width:100%; height:400px;".
- For fully responsive aspect ratios, wrap embed in a container and size via CSS.

HTML examples

Invalid example (reproduces the validator error)

<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <title>Invalid embed width</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <embed src="file.pdf" type="application/pdf" width="100%" height="600"></embed>
  </body>
</html>

Fixed example (valid pixels in attributes, or CSS for percentage)

<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <title>Valid embed width</title>
    <style>
      .embed-fluid {
        width: 100%;
        height: 600px;
        max-width: 800px; /* optional */
      }
    </style>
  </head>
  <body>
<!-- Option A: pixel attributes -->

    <embed src="file.pdf" type="application/pdf" width="800" height="600"></embed>

<!-- Option B: CSS controls percentage width -->

    <embed src="file.pdf" type="application/pdf" class="embed-fluid"></embed>
  </body>
</html>

Learn more:

<embed>: The Embed External Content element - MDN

Last reviewed: August 11, 2025

Was this guide helpful?

Related W3C validator issues

Bad value “auto” for attribute “height | weight” on element “img”: Expected a digit but saw “a” instead.

The width and height attributes on <img> elements expect a digit to specify the dimension in pixels. It should not contain units, letters or percent signs.

You can achieve this using CSS instead, for example:

<!-- Invalid syntax, the height attribute expects only digits -->

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="cat" height="auto" />

<!-- Valid syntax using CSS -->

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="cat" style="height: auto"  />

Bad value “auto” for attribute “width” on element “img”: Expected a digit but saw “a” instead.

The width attribute on the img element must be a positive integer representing the number of pixels.

The HTML img element’s width and height attributes are expected to specify image dimensions in pixels. According to the HTML Living Standard, these attributes accept only non-negative integers. These integers define the rendered dimension of the image, overriding the actual image size based on its native resolution. The value “auto” is not a valid integer, which leads to the validation error you’ve encountered.

Here is a correct usage example of the img element:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <title>Valid Image Width</title>
</head>
<body>
  <img src="example.jpg" alt="Example image" width="200" height="100">
</body>
</html>

In the example above, the width is set to 200, and the height is set to 100. Both values are non-negative integers representing pixel dimensions. If you intend to maintain the image’s aspect ratio while adjusting another dimension, you can omit one of the attributes, and modern browsers will automatically adjust the aspect ratio based on the given dimension.

Bad value “auto” for attribute “width” on element “video”: Expected a digit but saw “a” instead.

The error message is indicating that the width attribute of the <video> element has an invalid value. According to the HTML specification, the width attribute expects a non-negative integer value, representing the pixel width of the video.

The value "auto" is not valid for the width attribute. Instead, specify a full number that indicates the pixel width of the video. If you want the video to be responsive without specifying a fixed width, you can use CSS to achieve that.

Here are two ways to resolve this:

Specify a valid pixel value for width:

<video width="640" height="360" controls>
  <source src="video.mp4" type="video/mp4">
  Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>

Use CSS for a responsive video player:

Instead of using the width attribute, use CSS to set the width of the video element. This allows the video to adjust its size according to the container or viewport.

<style>
  .responsive-video {
    width: 100%;
    height: auto;
  }
</style>

<video class="responsive-video" controls>
  <source src="video.mp4" type="video/mp4">
  Your browser does not support the video tag.
</video>

In the second example, the video will scale based on its containing element, maintaining its aspect ratio due to the height: auto; CSS rule. This approach offers more flexibility for responsive design.

Bad value for attribute “srcset” on element “source”: No width specified for image X. (When the “sizes” attribute is present, all image candidate strings must specify a width.)

srcset
width

Bad value “” for attribute “(width|height)” on element “iframe”: The empty string is not a valid non-negative integer.

Bad value “” for attribute “(width|height)” on element “img”: The empty string is not a valid non-negative integer.

The HTML specification requires that the width and height attributes on <img> elements, when present, contain a string representing a non-negative integer — that is, a sequence of one or more ASCII digits like "0", "150", or "1920". An empty string ("") does not satisfy this requirement, so the W3C validator flags it as an error.

This issue commonly arises when:

A CMS or templating engine outputs width="" or height="" because no dimension value was configured.
JavaScript dynamically sets img.setAttribute("width", "") instead of removing the attribute.
A developer adds the attributes as placeholders intending to fill them in later but forgets to do so.

Why it matters

Providing valid width and height attributes is one of the most effective ways to prevent Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). Browsers use these values to calculate the image’s aspect ratio and reserve the correct amount of space before the image loads. When the values are empty strings, the browser cannot determine the aspect ratio, so no space is reserved — leading to layout shifts as images load in, which hurts both user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Beyond performance, invalid attribute values can cause unpredictable rendering behavior across browsers. Some browsers may ignore the attribute, others may interpret the empty string as 0, collapsing the image to zero pixels in that dimension. Standards-compliant HTML also improves accessibility by ensuring assistive technologies can parse the document reliably.

Examples

❌ Invalid: empty string values

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="A sunset over the ocean" width="" height="">

Both width and height are set to empty strings, which is not valid.

✅ Fixed: provide actual dimensions

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="A sunset over the ocean" width="800" height="600">

Replace the empty strings with the image’s actual pixel dimensions. These values should reflect the image’s intrinsic (natural) size. CSS can still be used to scale the image visually — the browser will use the width and height ratio to reserve the correct space.

✅ Fixed: remove the attributes entirely

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="A sunset over the ocean">

If you don’t know the dimensions or prefer to handle sizing purely through CSS, remove the attributes altogether. An absent attribute is valid; an empty one is not.

❌ Invalid: only one attribute is empty

<img src="banner.jpg" alt="Promotional banner" width="1200" height="">

Even if only one attribute has an empty value, the validation error will be triggered for that attribute.

✅ Fixed: both attributes with valid values

<img src="banner.jpg" alt="Promotional banner" width="1200" height="400">

Fixing dynamic/template-generated markup

If a template language is outputting empty attributes, use a conditional to omit them when no value is available. For example, in a template:

<!-- Instead of always outputting the attributes: -->

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="Description" width="" height="">

<!-- Conditionally include them only when values exist: -->

<img src="photo.jpg" alt="Description" width="800" height="600">

If you’re setting dimensions via JavaScript, remove the attribute rather than setting it to an empty string:

// ❌ Don't do this
img.setAttribute("width", "");

// ✅ Do this instead
img.removeAttribute("width");

// ✅ Or set a valid value
img.setAttribute("width", "800");

A note on values

The width and height attributes only accept non-negative integers — whole numbers without units, decimals, or percentage signs. Values like "100px", "50%", or "3.5" are also invalid. Use plain integers like "100" or "600". If you need responsive sizing with percentages or other CSS units, apply those through CSS styles instead.

Bad value X” for attribute “height” on element “embed”: Expected a digit but saw “p” instead.

Remove the unit; height on embed expects a non-negative integer (pixels) or a valid CSS length only when set via CSS, not the HTML attribute.

Detailed explanation

The embed element supports the presentational attributes width and height as unsigned integers representing CSS pixels. In HTML, the height attribute must be a number without a unit, for example 650. Supplying 650px violates the attribute’s value syntax and triggers the validator error.

If you want to use units or other CSS lengths (e.g., px, em, %, vh), set them with CSS via the style attribute or a stylesheet using the height property, not the HTML attribute.

HTML examples

Example reproducing the issue

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <title>Embed height invalid</title>
</head>
<body>
  <embed src="file.pdf" type="application/pdf" width="800" height="650px">
</body>
</html>

Corrected example (HTML attribute as integer)

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <title>Embed height fixed</title>
</head>
<body>
  <embed src="file.pdf" type="application/pdf" width="800" height="650">
</body>
</html>

Alternative corrected example (use CSS units)

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <title>Embed height via CSS</title>
  <style>
    .viewer { width: 800px; height: 650px; }
  </style>
</head>
<body>
  <embed class="viewer" src="file.pdf" type="application/pdf">
</body>
</html>

Bad value X for attribute “srcset” on element “img”: No width specified for image Y. (When the “sizes” attribute is present, all image candidate strings must specify a width.)

The srcset attribute requires a width descriptor (w) or pixel density descriptor (x) for each image candidate when the sizes attribute is present.

When using the sizes attribute on an img element, each entry in srcset must include either a width descriptor (e.g., 860w) or a pixel density descriptor (e.g., 2x). This tells browsers how to select the most appropriate image source for the current viewport or display density. Omitting the descriptor leads to HTML validation errors and unexpected image selection.

Correct usage with width descriptors:

<img
  alt=""
  sizes="(min-width:568px) 140px"
  srcset="photo.png?w=860&amp;q=90 860w"
  src="photo.png?w=860&amp;q=90">

Correct usage with pixel density descriptors (if sizes is removed):

<img
  alt=""
  srcset="photo.png?w=860&amp;q=90 2x"
  src="photo.png?w=860&amp;q=90">

Key points:

With sizes, use width descriptors (e.g., 860w).
Without sizes, you may use pixel density descriptors (e.g., 2x).
Always use either px or w units in the sizes attribute values; do not use w.

Bad value X for attribute “srcset” on element “source”: No width specified for image Y. (When the “sizes” attribute is present, all image candidate strings must specify a width.)

srcset
width

Bad value X for attribute “(width | height)” on element “iframe”: Expected a digit but saw “.” instead.

The attributes width and height on an iframe expect a valid positive integer without any decimals.

Here’s an example of incorrect code where decimals are being used for dimension attributes:

<iframe src="example.html" height="602.88" width="800.2"></iframe>

Corrected code without decimals:

<iframe src="example.html" height="603" width="800"></iframe>

In the corrected code, the width and height values has been changed to a whole number, which conforms to the standard integer value expected by the W3C validator.